
As I get older, I find myself occasionally shaking my head and wondering what’s going on. My kids will tell you it’s been happening for years, but I really noticed it yesterday watching the Super Bowl. It wasn’t the game that had me confused, although it had its moments. It was the commercials. As mentioned here Friday, advertisers shelled out big bucks for their Super Bowl spots; $2.6 million for the air time plus the cost of production.
Either I’m totally out of touch, or some of them didn’t get their money’s worth. Don’t get me wrong. I understand that we Baby Boomers, even though we’re the largest demographic group, aren’t necessarily the target for many advertisers. But boomers do buy beer and soft drinks and snacks. We ship packages and we rent movies. Shouldn’t we at least understand what the commercial is trying to say?
One thing that struck me was the amount of violence in a lot of the spots. I’m no prude. I watch "CSI" and "Law and Order", in all their various permutations. I like football, and hockey, and NASCAR, and the occasional rodeo, so I’m not opposed to a little mayhem in its proper place. But is hitting your buddy in the head with a rock really the best way to decide who gets the last Bud Light? Does a robot committing suicide really sell cars? Then there was the car accident to show us how great Doritos are and the poor girl who got thrown off the treadmill, just because the guy on the neighboring piece of exercise equipment had used the newest, best razor.
I hate to pick on Bud Light again, especially since they’ve consistently delivered the cleverest commercials over the years, but wasn’t the spot where the couple picks up the axe-wielding hitchhiker ("It’s a bottle opener"), just because he’s carrying a case of beer a little bit much?
The American Heart Association spot, which ran twice, showing the hear being attacked, was a little graphic, but at least it made a point. It just seems like if there was a theme to this year’s advertising, it was that violence sells. Of course, it was a football game.
On the other hand, there were some clever commercials, including a couple from Bud Light. I thought the HP spot featuring American Chopper’s Paul Teutel Sr., was great, but it may not have been effective, especially with people who have no idea who he is. Letterman and Oprah was brilliant.
The moral to the story, I suppose, is that if your company is big enough, you can take a chance on a $2.6 million ad. If nothing else, you hope people will be talking about you on Monday morning. But for the rest of us, a little more common sense might be in order. If your ad budget limits you to a couple of newspaper ads each month, you may need to be a little more cautious. Of course, it’s the different that gets noticed.
Filed under: Advertising, Marketing and Positioning | Leave a comment »